Walk: Hood, AMC Kubuki Theater (The Odyssey)
Distance: 4.5 miles average
The Odyssey movie Ratings:
Rotten Tomatoes Critics: 95%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience: 97%
Ciwt: 78% - mostly for special effects and scope of undertaking by Writer/Director Nolan,
95% (probably) -as a blockerbuster pure and simple (although Ciwt doesn't go to many of those so is taking the RT Critics' reviews score)
30% for the Rest
So Ciwt went to the first matinee of The Odyssey because of its very high Rotten Tomatoes ratings and because she had never read the Homer poetic epic. This would be her chance to have a superb getaway and take in one of the most significant works of the Western canon. (Wikipedia)/ among the greatest literary achievements in human history (historyandculture.org).
What she actually saw (between naps) was more of the same movie making she's been staying out of the theaters (sadly) to avoid: zero meaningful dialogue, acting that went from blunt to inept, AI generated monsters and creepy settings, one man taking on the entire world, prolonged manly fight after manly fight after manly fight causing horrific death after horrific death after horrific death. Brute movie making. In other words, for her, as a top rated over all movie, the emperor had no clothes.
This is not movie making that Ciwt values. But clearly it is movie making of the times and Ciwt is a dinosaur. Her list of 'her type' of movies is extensive, and basically duplicates any Top 100 Movies Ever lists - maybe in slightly different order. She's certainly no stranger to violence and loved: Psycho, Pulp Fiction and much of Tarantino's work, The Godfathers 1 & 2. In terms of modern movies of her type she would point to Parasite as the most stunningly brilliant movies she has ever seen - including its bloodbath and early stomach turning setting.
Every one of these movies - and more - have some combination of great acting, meaningful dialogue and plot, depth, psychological/human truth, intrigue, often humor. The list goes on. They were worth Ciwt's time (often multiple times) and she would happily recommend them.
But today's aesthetic - at least in movies for now - has morphed. She gets it; it is bigger than her apparently. That a movie as one note as The Odyssey can be reviewed by the audience as Perfect in every way from cinematography, sound mixing, acting writing and direction, ABSOLUTELY INSANELY INCREDIBLE, etc is disappointing to Ciwt but no longer shocks her.
But it does disappoint her.
Addendum - Great minds (except his is about 10 times greater)...Ciwt has a film buddy who wrote his thoughts about The Odyssey a few weeks after Ciwt's post. Here it is:
Speaking of Trojans, I think I am about done with the post-Odyssey film research.
Enjoyable was the critique coming from the 2017 female translator of the poem into iambic pentameter, Emily Wilson, who was popping up in many media outlets and interviews. In particular:
"Nolan's Odyssey lacks many of the elements that make the poem great. It has nothing convincing to say about time, memory, history, war, or about the relationship between one warrior's glorious return and the lives of his family, adversaries, comrades, friends and neighbors. It lacks psychological, emotional, political and ethical depth. Its narrative structure is gimmicky. The writing is abysmal. None of the characters has convincing motivation for their actions or words. There are no sex scenes, and all the food looks horrible."
She states she longed for the sailor earwax while watching the film.
Otherwise she gave it a thumbs up for the renewed interest in the work.
Her first introduction to the poem was acting in a school production of The Odyssey when she was 8.
A theme of her critique was that Odysseus was a "complicated and complex man" in the poem, but not in the film, and not the Nolan invention of guilt-complex about the Troy carnage.